Bridge Vs Poker

Bridge
  1. Bridge Vs Poker Cards
  2. Bridge Vs Poker
  3. Kem Bridge Vs Poker
Bridge Vs Poker

Poker is one of the many games involving the use of a 52-card deck of playing cards. The 52 cards are categorized by 13 ranks from Two through Ace (Aces can be counted as both higher than King and lower than Two when needed, but can only count as one at a time in a hand), and by four suits: diamonds, hearts, spades, and clubs. A bridge-size deck of cards is 1/4 of an inch narrower, so it measures 2.25 inches wide, and 3.50 inches tall (same as a poker deck). Should I play with a Poker or Bridge size deck of cards? We recommend that if you are playing poker, or any card game that requires you to hold relatively few cards in your hand, you should select a poker-size.

[ F.A.Q. ]
[ Magic Café Donations ]

Bridge Vs Poker Cards

Bridge
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Bridge Vs. Poker Size? (1 Likes)

Bridge Vs Poker

Go to page 1~2~3 [Next]
Hood
Veteran user
326 Posts

0
I know this has been discussed here before and I always have used poker size cards but I when I palm a poker card, the card is physically wider than my hand so it always flashes. It is not a technique problem it is anatomical issue. This being the case and I really want to use a card to wallet what are some of your thoughts on using bridge cards? Just use them don't worry or ..... Also I am almost a completely full time magician so I would just use bridge cards and ditch poker size. Just kinda stuck, any thoughts would be great.
Justin W
Special user
Lawrence, KS
929 Posts

0
Malini, Lorayne, blah, blah, blah, etc, etc.
You're most likely gonna get the same answer again and again--several top-notch, legendary magicians have and had small hands.
Misdirection is your friend.
Roger Kelly
Inner circle
Kent, England
3330 Posts

0
A card is a card! Bridge size is ALL we had in the UK until recent years.
RyanAdams
Regular user
104 Posts

0
When I first started out as a youngster, I always used bridge cards but then realised that with a little misdirection poker sized are fine. Just go for it!!
magicfish
Inner circle
6649 Posts

0
Merc Man
Inner circle
Nuneaton, Warwickshire
2652 Posts

0
If you are in USA, try Aviator Bridge (as you can't any longer get Fox Lakes or Aristocrats).
If Bridge size was good enough for a working pro like Don Alan, they're good enough for anyone!
Barry Allen
'The rules of a sleight of hand artist, are three and all others are vain. The first and second are PRACTICE and the third one is PRACTICE AGAIN.
Edward Victor 1937 (Magic Of The Hands).
Claudio
Inner circle
Europe
1577 Posts

0
Be pragmatic: if poker cards are too big, just use bridge size. If you're performing for non-magicians, they're unlikely to call you on that.
Merc Man
Inner circle
Nuneaton, Warwickshire
2652 Posts

0
Just to add, and l could be wrong, but with palming cards or coins, confidence and misdirection are just as critical as technique.
If Poker size are giving you problems and your confidence palming them is shot, then you will undoubtedly telegraph this fact.
Give Bridge size cards a go - and see how you get on with them.
Barry Allen
'The rules of a sleight of hand artist, are three and all others are vain. The first and second are PRACTICE and the third one is PRACTICE AGAIN.
Edward Victor 1937 (Magic Of The Hands).
Hood
Veteran user
326 Posts

0
Thanks for your thoughts I am going to give bridge cards a shot at my next gig and see if anyone says anything. My mentor just told me as well that no one will really care except for magicians.
Thanks
jim ferguson
Loyal user
Ayrshire, Scotland
284 Posts

0
Just use whatever cards you like. Many pros have used bridge cards exclusivly. Its not the cards (or size of) but what you do with them.
Remember there are also some good no-palm card to wallets aswell.
jim
bishthemagish
Inner circle
6036 Posts

0
Use what you like - I like both so I use both bridge size and poker size and several different brand names.
Just my opinion
Glenn Bishop Cardician
Producer of the DVD Punch Deal Pro
Publisher of Glenn Bishop's Ace Cutting And Block Transfer Triumphs
R.E. Byrnes
Inner circle
1206 Posts

0
I wish there were a convention of using bridge-sized because i, too, find them easier to handle. yes, the stories of great card handlers with small hands are legend; that doesn't, however, obviate the fact that smaller cards are, above all, easier to palm. but because bridge-size cards are so unusual, it seems they would be conspicuous. and the difference isn't all that great. there's a clear convention of using poker-size cards in magic. I'd suggest simply working within that convention and accentuating the fact that people with small hands have excelled, rather than the equally true fact that it would be easier to work with smaller cards.
S2000magician
Inner circle
Yorba Linda, CA
3469 Posts

0
Quote:
On 2011-04-19 15:28, R.E. Byrnes wrote:
. . . that doesn't, however, obviate the fact that smaller cards are, above all, easier to palm.

Obviate?
I'm a bridge player, but I use poker cards for magic. I have the advantage of fairly large hands, and the disadvantage of windows between my fingers. As mentioned many times, misdirection covers a lot of sins (and shortcomings).
BCIII
The Polite Side of Magic
Risk Mitigation Associates
Bottom Line Gurus
Financial Exam Help 123
I took the Pledge
metaljohn
Loyal user
Montreal, QC
280 Posts

0
I have long fingers and my hands aren't that wide. To top it off, I have 'windows' between my fingers. I'm pretty sure it took me longer than the average person to perfect palming. For almost two months, I'd just practice palming a card. Even while watching TV or something. I drove my girlfriend up the wall . I still think if I had bigger hands, it'd be easier, but as many have said before, practice and misdirection is key. My misdirection is good enough that I haven't been caught yet. Even my girlfriend who's seen me practice palming cards so much was fooled the other day when I showed her a new trick that involved a card palm.
Hood
Veteran user
326 Posts

0
Today is the first day I really have ever used bridge cards, I tried some sleights out and as I thought much easier and I feel like I have a lot more control plus palming now is a non issue. I tried out a few effects today and not one person noticed the cards were small. I guess this may be one of those things were I was thinking too much, just use what fits me better and not worry about it. I know I will get some words from time to time from other magicians but I figure what works for them doesn't have to work for me. As my mentor say's why make things harder on yourself if it is not needed. Thanks again for all your reply's.
molsen
Special user
Copenhagen
552 Posts

0
I am happy to hear bridge size cards work better for you, that is really all that matters. If you get hassled by other magicians for this, don't pay attention to it. The fact that they care more about the cards you use than what you do with them, proves that their opinion is of very little value.
Michael
Hood
Veteran user
326 Posts

0
Michael,
I appreciate your comment and honestly that is what I was most worried about other magicians not laypeople but I really like how you put it into perspective for me about other magicians.
Thank you,
Derek
warren
Inner circle
uk
3284 Posts

0
Use what works best for you here in the uk bridge size cards are far more common than the poker size cards that I use,when ever I get asked about the cards I use which isn't very often I just say they're better quality:)
NicholasD
Inner circle
1460 Posts

0
Howie Schwartzman. Small hands. Great palms and passes.
van
Loyal user
276 Posts

0
Charlie Miller and Jerry Andrus both used bridge cards
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » The workers » » Bridge Vs. Poker Size? (1 Likes)
Go to page 1~2~3 [Next]

Kem Bridge Vs Poker

[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.15 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <